本文目录一览：
深度解析：雅思大作文之环境类话题怎么破
讨论型的大作文：第一段一般用三到四句话左右第一句，先把上面的题目用同义词替换一下，还有可以句型转换什么的，一般需要改动三处左右，不然算抄袭原题要扣分的。第二第三句把两个观点都阐述一下，也可以一句话说明第四句，就是表达自己的观点，可以保持中立或者同意上边任意一个观点现在一般都是讨论型的作文，如果是报告的，反正格式大概就是这样的~你可以参考十天突破雅思作文，感觉很不错的，里面有模板的，还有很多不同类型的题目可能用到的词句~值得参考的~但是不要去背上面的，自己做一个属于自己的常用模板
环境问题的雅思写作作文
Environmental problems are so big that they cannot be solved by any person or country alone. Instead, it should be solved at international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Environmental degradation has been recognized as one of the main challenges that we have to overcome in the 21st century. The rapid deterioration of environmental problems is believed to have posed a serious threat to our survival. To address this concern, countries worldwide should join forces, instead of working individually for their own target.
People support international cooperation for two reasons. The first point is the impact of environmental problem is normally on a global scale. It is common knowledge that we share the same biosphere, its components are interrelated. For example, a stream in one country can be polluted by the sewage dumped by its neighboring country. In other words, one country’s effort to reduce pollution can be futile if other countries are not involved. It should also noted that some countries do not have adequate resources to reduce pollution, even though these countries realize the importance of environmental protection. These countries can cooperate with developed countries, introduce technologies and draw on experiences so as to implement environmentally friendly policies continuously.
Despite the importance of international cooperation, countries should take the initiative to implement some changes. It is fair to say that countries are confronted with different environmental problem. For example, greenhouse gas emissions in China are mainly created by the electricity generation industries while in the United States are primarily attributed to the increase in car use. The technologies and methods that are globally applicable may not be effective in some countries.In addition, countries should enforce some environmental laws and raise citizens’ awareness so as to restore the environment.
To summaries, countries should make a join effort not only because the ecosystem is a unified mechanism but also because it can make optimal use of financial and human resources. Country’s resource commitment is also important at regional or national level.
In some countries, it is possible for people to buy products made in other countries. To what extent do the benefits of this development outweigh the problems?
As the world is increasingly globalised, the exchange of commodities across the border is proceeding at an astounding rate. It has sparked controversy over whether the increase in imports has adverse impacts. From my point of view, this practice’s advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
Importing goods can yield a number of benefits. The first benefit is that despite the high cost of transportation, imports are competitively priced. The main reason is that the countries that export these goods normally have technology and professional knowledge to ensure the goods’ quality and affordability. For example, China specialises in the production of textile products so China-made textile products are cheaper than local counterparts in many parts of the world. Besides, imported goods have challenged domestic manufacturers’ dominance and intensified competition, thereby prompting these manufacturers to lower product prices. It is beneficial to domestic customers, because products are more affordable and the cost of living will decline.
On the other hand, the downside of importing goods is that the excessive reliance on imports is likely to lead to the underdevelopment of some domestic industries. For instance, many countries import computers, resulting in domestic manufactures’ bankruptcy. This is harmful to the development of a self-contained economy, and also likely to trigger massive job cuts. Another problem is that transportation may create considerable pollution, especially when it involves air freight. It will degrade air quality and also lead to other environment issues, such as global warming.
It is therefore reasonable to think that the advantages of importing of commodities should be accepted with caution. Although customers are able to acquire commodities at lower cost, countries also need to pay attention to the development of their respective industries.
Some people believe that charities should give aid to those who need the aid most, wherever they live. Some people believe that charity organisations would better concentrate on people in their own countries instead. Discuss both views and give your own pinion.
Concern about humanitarian has been heightened in recent years. Although international aid illustrates a moral ideal of mankind, many people who hold the opposing views think that the welfare of fellow citizens is the priority. International aid has its weaknesses but its importance should not be denied.
The main reason why international donation agencies should view international aid from a global perspectives is that their funds can help the citizens of those recipient countries to combat poverty, disease and inequality. We should recognise that citizens of developing countries are in desperate need of aid, because they are susceptible to natural or man-made disasters such as wars. In those war-ton or poverty-stricken countries, resources are extremely scarce, which demand for food, medicine, tents and shelters.
Despite the importance of helping those beyond our national borders, it is reasonable to lend a hand to our fellow citizens. Even in the richest countries, there are some disadvantaged people whose needs for daily necessities are not met. If we can solve problems on our doorstep, low income people can have basic living standards and this is beneficial to social stability.
From my personal perspective, humanitarian action can restore some of their basic rights, such as the right to receive education, in recipient countries. This is consistent with the universal principle of supporting vulnerable populations. Those who cannot provide financial support can work as aid workers and deliver services to those needy people.
To summaries, we should realise the implications of international aid to those who are affected by disasters, poverty and misfortunes. We can deliver aid to other countries to show compassion, although helping local beneficiaries is important.
The tourist industry has been expanding in some countries and international tourism has benefited these countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, tourism has become an important industry and has brought unprecedented opportunities to these countries. However, the impact of tourism on these countries remains a source of constant debate. The essay will elaborate on both positive and negative impacts of tourism.
The implications of tourism for some countries are two fold. First of all, it should be recognised that the development of tourism stimulates economic growth by generating enormous employment opportunities and increasing foreign exchange earnings. This benefit is particularly valuable to those impoverished countries, whose citizens are jobless, malnourished and ill-housed. Tourism provides a driving force for the development of various industries such as hospitality, transportation, communications, retail sales and manufacture, which require substantial capital investments. Without the revenues created by tourism, these industries are not likely to develop and the economic growth will be sluggish. Furthermore, tourism provides economic incentives for cultural preservation, because some places of cultural importance,e.g., historical sites,remain the most popular destinations.Those who express concerns about the negative effect of tourism should realise that tourism revenues can be used to protect cultural or historical heritage and also the local landscape.
On the negative side, environmental destruction is one problem that arises from international tourism. The construction of infrastructure and tourism facilities(including airports, roads,hotels and resorts) will destroy environmental resources. Another problem associated with tourism is that it can threaten the local culture. The arrival of tourists can disrupt the life of local people, who abandon their traditional livelihoods and start to work in the tourism industry. It is also true that in many places, local people do not embrace tourism with open arms. Due to a lack of understanding of local customs, tourists might display some impolite or even offensive behaviour, which can lead to local people’s unhappiness or hostility.
In the light of these facts, we can come to the conclusion that tourism can help some countries reap benefits although these countries may have to accept social and environmental costs. These countries should promote culturally appropriate activities and require tourists to show respect for the local life, traditions and natural scenery.
English has become a universal language. Do you think that the positive effects of the trend outweigh negative effects?
At the present time, the role of English as a global language is indispensable, but it is worth mentioning that the prevalence of English worldwide might have its negative effect. In my opinion, English’s dominance can be viewed in a positive light.
It is unquestionable that the extensive use of English worldwide helps promote international cooperation, as language constitutes the biggest barrier to people’s communication in the global setting. For example, if a company’s financial statements are written in English, any investor who has a good command of English is able to read this company’s documents and understand this company’s operation, whether or not English is their first language. That’s why English has been recognised as the main language by many international conferences and academic groups. Around 80 per cent of websites in the world present their information in English. It would be no exaggeration to say that those who do not speak English find it difficult to survive in the global community. By contrast, people who have proficiency in two languages( English plus their native language) can easily find jobs, collect information and travel overseas.
Despite the contribution of the English language to globalisation, it is considered the main culprit of the loss of language diversity. The idea lies in the fact that many English learners, such as those who move to English-speaking countries, speak their native language less frequently. It should also be noted that English, as the favorite language for international media, conveys English-speaking countries’ lifestyles, values and beliefs to different parts of the world. It might affect the world’s cultural diversify.
In spite of this, I am convinced that English is able to bridge the language gap and introduce minority cultures to the world, thereby protecting these cultures.
In conclusion, English plays a vital role in communication and cooperation among people from different countries. Although some people suspect that English will endanger some minority languages. This claim is not supported with evidence. The reality is that English sometimes assists us protecting cultural heritage.
Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent public services and facilities. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Government sponsorship for arts is a controversial issue, especially when the state is confronted with budget problems. There who object to public funds for arts believe that money should be diverted to the construction of public facilities. I am of the opinion that the government should take citizens’ benefits into consideration and adjust the spending on art or infrastructures accordingly.
It is important to realise that art is an essential component of cultural legacy, so the protection and development of art has important implications to cultural diversity. In terms of painting, for example, styles, genres, tools and materials differ from culture to culture. An art form is likely to disappear, if it is not well protected.
Despite the importance of art, public facilities deserve more of government spending than art. Citizens are interested in the availability of public facilities, such as water and electricity supply, schools, libraries and roads, which have a direct impact on their daily lives. By contrast, for most people, sculptures, paintings or operas are luxury items, which cannot bring tangible benefit to them. Therefore, it is pointless to support the use of public funds for this purpose, if basic facilities are underfunded and ill-equipped to meet public needs.
I personally think that the arts should get public money, because it boosts the appeal of the built environment, reflected in the diversity of architecture and landscaping. If we are exposed to visually attractive objects everyday, we can enjoy peace of mind and feel an increased level of satisfaction with life. People will be less likely to commit violent or anti-social behaviors, and this is beneficial to community cohesion.
In the light of the facts outlined above, government investment in the arts is essential to cultural diversity and the visual appeal of the built environment. However, in those countries whose infrastructure is inadequate, spending cuts on the arts are justifiable.
Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The government has long been the major founder of university education. Those people who support government spending on education think that some students do not enroll because of learning costs. My view is that students’ personal situations should be considered, before the government decides whether to offer free education.
It is worth noting that university education is the key to bridging the income gap. There are numerous students, especially those from low income families, who cannot afford educational expenses. For example, students who study architecture or medical science may spend many years in the university, which is an expensive choice for them. Because of financial constraints, people of low socio-economic status are at a disadvantage in terms of educational opportunities and career development. If the government provides free access to education, children from disadvantaged backgrounds can get into the college and find decent jobs in future.This can close the social divide and create a prosperous country.
Even though government sponsorship can inspire people to receive tertiary education, it can also cause the waste of public resources. Free education may be a reason why many students are reluctant to complete their courses and enter the workforce at the earliest date. It not only imposes a burden on the country but also affects state funding for other sectors(e.g., primary and secondary education). Another problem is that, because of financial pressures, universities cannot upgrade facilities and recruit well-qualified lecturers, which can have a negative impact on students’ academic achievement.
To summarise, government should provide financial support according to students’ needs to ensure that they have access to education. However, tuition fees are applicable to most students, especially those from middle to high income families, as it helps maintain the quality of tertiary education.
Some people say that the government should ensure that people lead a healthy life, while others believe that individuals should have their own choices. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Healthy lifestyle is very important because it relevant to dignity and happiness. It is suggested that people are unlikely to adopt healthy lifestyle, unless the government takes some actions. My view is that lifestyle should be decided by people themselves, despite the importance of the government’s guidance and intervention.
It is reasonable to argue that if people can choose their lifestyles freely, it reflects the respect for basic human rights. People who are obsessed with how to comply with government regulations will live under tremendous pressure. Although people are encouraged to eat vegetables and adopt a balanced diet, it does not mean that laws should specify the proportion of vegetables in diet. It not only poses a threat to their health, but also causes their resentment against the government.
On the other hand, it is important for the government to impose restrictions on some habits, especially those that are widely believed to be damaging. This is due to the fact that most people have difficulty in disciplining themselves and cannot refrain from some unhealthy habits. For example, it is common knowledge smoking is harmful to people’s health but many people have problems ceasing smoking. The consequence is that their behaviour not only damage their own health but also has an adverse effect on others. Their reliance on medical care leads to overconsumption of resources and a higher demand for the use of taxpayers’ money; this is unfair to those who follow healthy habits.
Overall, I believe that one’s freedom to choose lifestyles should be protected provided that it dose not interfere with other people. The primary role of the government is to provide information rather than to regulate citizens’ behaviour. This is important especially when citizens do not realise the health consequences of their habits and their problems can put pressure on the health service.
The society is based on rules and laws. The society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Laws refer to the rules imposed on human beings. Although the laws is important in regulating people’s behaviour, many people argue that it restricts individuals’ freedom. I think that it is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the functions of law in society and its demerits.
It is an undeniable fact that the law informs citizens of the rules that are recognized by the whole society. The essential point of formulating laws is that laws can prevent one from engaging in actions that are harmful to other people. Anybody who fails to comply with laws will be punished, so the law helps establish a harmonious society. For example, people may commit robberies and murder because of jealous, greed and hatred. If these actions were accepted on the grounds of personal choice, it would be detrimental to other people’s interest. It is also true that many ethical standards, such as those standards that emphasis honesty, loyalty and compassion, enhance social cohesion.
Nevertheless, laws sometimes inevitably infringe upon human’s freedom and even hamper social development. For instance, if one country has many limits on the business world, the business activity will not be active. High income earners who are subject income tax rates may lack motivation to make greater efforts to increase their income. It is also the case that in a society where personal freedoms, such as the freedom of speech are limited, it is impossible to have different voices heard and solve problem efficiently.
It is reasonable to conclude that society cannot operate well without laws and rules. Even though the law does not allow people to act at will, the main purpose is to create a society where people can live in harmony.
雅思写作大作文高分范文：如何更好地解决环境问题
As a necessary tool in daily life, vehicles, cars and airplanes in particular, have empowered people to go wherever they want, yet are frequently blamed for environmental problems. But it appears to me that in an attempt to address these problems, the simple rise of fuel prices is feasible but not the most effective and efficient solution.
作为日常生活中必不可少的工具，特别是汽车、汽车和飞机，让人们可以去任何环境雅思作文他们想去的地方，却常常被指责为环境问题的罪魁祸首。但在环境雅思作文我看来，为了解决这些问题，燃料价格的简单上涨是可行的，但不是最有效和最有效的解决方案。
Higher fuel cost in theory will reduce air pollution and relieve the fuel shortage. This is mainly because the higher the price of fuel is, the fewer drivers will afford it and cars and other vehicles will be used even less. The emission of greenhouse gases, the main contributor of global warming, will therefore decline and fewer fuels are consumed. However, this is not that simple in real life.Unable to drive cars as usual or to choose other transportation, workers will hardly work efficiently as most of them in today’s world rely heavily on cars and different vehicles especially for long distance commuters. In this case, they would rather pay the higher price than earn less or even lose their job.
理论上，燃料成本上升将减少空气污染，缓解燃料短缺。这主要是因为燃料价格越高，就会有更少的司机负担得起，而汽车和其环境雅思作文他车辆的使用将会更少。温室气体的排放，是全球变暖的主要原因，将因此减少，减少燃料消耗。然而，在现实生活中，这并不是那么简单。由于无法像往常一样开车或选择其他交通工具，工人们很难有效地工作，因为在当今世界，大多数人都严重依赖汽车和不同的车辆，尤其是长途通勤者。在这种情况下，他们宁愿付出更高的代价，也不愿赚得更少，甚至丢掉工作。
Increasing the cost of fuel could not resolve all environmental problems. During the delivery of oil to different places around the world, oil more often than not leaks into the oceans and contaminates the water, a severe environmental problem that seems to be unsolvable now. What’s worse, marine animals will die mainly because their habitat, the ocean, has been polluted and become inhabitable.
增加燃料的成本并不能解决所有的环境问题。在向世界各地输送石油的过程中，石油往往会泄漏到海洋中，污染水源，这是一个严重的环境问题，现在看来是无法解决的。更糟糕的是，海洋动物将会死亡，主要是因为它们的栖息地，海洋，已经被污染，并变得适宜居住。
This suggestion is less workable than other measures,like taking advantage of some cutting-edge technology and science to actively seek alternative fuel. For example, mainly powered by clean fuels or electricity,some fuel-efficient vehicles and electric cars, both of which have been widely used in most places of the world, not just burn less fuel but generate few emission.
这一建议比其他措施更不可行，比如利用一些尖端技术和科学，积极寻找替代燃料。例如，主要由清洁燃料或电力驱动，一些省油的汽车和电动汽车，这两种燃料在世界上的大多数地方都被广泛使用，不仅燃烧较少的燃料，而且产生很少的排放。
In conclusion, viable as it is , increasing the cost of fuels is not ideal and to a larger extent fails to be realistic and other ways need to be introduced.
环境类雅思作文有哪些素材
我曾经以为“漠然”是由心底迸发的毫不在乎、冰冷无情环境雅思作文，我也固执地把它与冷漠画上等号环境雅思作文，并且自私地从其中列数出他的种种冷酷与无情，殊知这样看似无情的外表下，竟贮存这那样一棵温暖的心。
诚然，父爱看似漠然却毫不冷漠。
我也确实有个与一般孩子不一般的童年，没有可以骑在父亲脖子上采桑葚的欢笑环境雅思作文；也没有与父亲一起河畔垂钓的怡然，在我的的印象中，他留给我的始终是个后背，都说催弦先生的《背影》写得极好，我却从不曾在我父亲的背影中读出些许柔情；也听崔京浩的父亲：“父亲是儿登天梯”，可始终不曾从他那儿寻到过一毕安慰。
随着年龄的增长，父爱的“匮乏”赵来赵令我不满，我努力做好功课，每次考试都考九十多分、一百分，只换他一句：“下次考好才是本事，”，我也曾故意调皮捣蛋，弄得老师带家长，希望引起他的注意，让他多关爱我，怎奈他什么话也不说，是一个劲冲老师点头，我逐渐从自以为以的“大爱无言”的走出来，再被父亲的那近乎“冷漠”的情感冰冻。
那日因为我找学习资料进了父亲的书房，从层层叠叠的书籍下拖出了一个似使用了多年的小木箱，虽显得破旧却纤尘不染，似乎父亲经常擦洗，好奇心作逐的我打开了木箱，那是一逢的奖状、照片、报纸……各类纸张上的主人公只有一个，那便是我，有六岁时他叠的小青蛙，有三年级时得的书法奖状，有十二岁那年儿童节作主持时用过的小领结……有最近“不翼而飞”的床头那张有我发表文章的报纸，有上次其中考试的成绩单，十九年的点点滴滴噢，在小小的木箱中展露无遗，我可以想像出父亲一人在灯下翻看这些奖着时嘴角露出的微笑，想像他是怎样一边满足的哼着小调，一边整理小木箱中东西的模样，我突然理解了父爱的含义。
也许全天下的父亲都是相似的，有着山一般巨大而深沉的爱，而这些爱，往往是隐藏在那些表面的无所事事，漠不关心的假象之下。
父亲的爱，从不挂在嘴上，“至爱无声”，几近漠然却如清清细流滋润我的胸怀；父爱无言，大善无声，虽看似平凡的冷漠更深处却激情如火，终生不渝。
我想唤您一声“爸”，不管是否依旧如以前那么淡然、无所谓的表情；我想努力学习，为环境雅思作文你争脸，不管环境雅思作文你是不是还是那么严厉地指责我的不尽之处，十多年的时间还算太长，我也终于明白，漠然不是冷漠，您的爱是我永久的太阳。
漠然相爱，寂静喜欢。
联系我们请扫一扫上面二维码