gre作文要写多少字
导语：夫学须志也，才须学也，非学无以广才，非志无以成学。以下我为大家介绍gre作文要写多少字文章，欢迎大家阅读参考!
gre作文要写多少字
新GRE作文考试，虽然对于文章的字数并没有提出具体的字数要求，但在保证文章质量的前提下，多少字数比较适合是大家都十分关心的问题，下面就GRE作文要求的.两种作文类型分别介绍字数要求。GRE作文写法特点详细介绍 。另外，GRE作文备考如何3天速成？选择好模板方法不重要
新GRE ISSUE作文字数要求
字数问题，太少的文章势必低分，因为字数太少，很难将一个问题阐述的非常清楚，尤其是ISSUE。按照考试经验，550---650的ISSUE字数往往最有效。而不是写得越多越好。有些考生，文章写得冗长无比，其实思路混乱，没有逻辑性。这种文章，势必低分。所以，ISSUE作文要拿到高分，关键还是要看文章的组织架构是否合理，论点的展开是否恰当，论证是否有力、到位。这些要求需要一定的字数做保障，但不绝对。
新GRE ARGUMENT作文字数要求
至于ARGUMENT，一般来说，字数400以上基本就够了。ARGU的关键是要能准确的找出逻辑错误，并恰当的给予反驳，重点还是在于内容，把要说的观点都写清楚即可，字数同样不需要强求。
新GRE作文模板如何使用
熟悉模版，把模版的打字时间减少到最少，以节省自己构思的时间。
把自己完整写过的并且修改过多次的文章背熟。
进一步润色自己的文章，磨砺词汇和语句，总结以备使用
过一遍题库，再让自己熟悉一下，看到题目自己在脑子里过一遍想法，最后确保自己每个题目都知道说什么，以免抽到低频时无话可说，可以用模考软件随机抽套题，然后写一篇。
温习模版，明确每套模版适用于什么情况。
GRE写作该如何备考？可以说的详细一些么？
GRE整体看更像一个逻辑考试，Verbal不是光背单词就够gre作文的，写作也不是语言好就可以高枕无忧gre作文的。
事实上，很多语言不错的同学，写作分数也不过4分（gre作文他们是可以拿到4.5或者更高的分数的）。那问题出在哪呢？就是他们写作的逻辑不够严谨。
相较与有固定攻击套路的Argument来讲，Issue更让人头疼。
同学们需要根据题目中简单的1-2句话，展开一个长达450-500词的讨论。在这个过程中，逻辑是很多同学的失分项。
接下来，我们拿一个真题为例，和大家一起来剖析一下GRE Issue的写作逻辑。
【Issue 66】All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's school
看到这道题目，很多同学不假思索就开始讨论对家长和学生的影响。但事实上，这道题目的切入点可以做的更好。
-
首先，我们来判断公式，这道题目属于N应该做某事。那N是谁呢?
题目中说parents should be required，那么N就是发出require这个动作的主体—学校。
所以我们首先应该讨论这么做对学校有什么影响。
然后再另起一段去讨论对parents and students的影响是什么。最后写让步或反驳段就可以gre作文了。
这样写的好处是我们可以意识到家长是被要求的，那为什么会有这样的要求，一定会去学校有好处的。这样我们整篇文章的论述角度就会更加完整。
我们想好思路之后，就可以开始构思具体的写作大纲啦。
Introduction
Some people advocate that educational institutions should require parents to spend much time on serving their children’s schools. From my perspective, this is an insightful proposal.
开头段只要清晰表明自己的观点就好啦。字数不宜过多。
Main Paragraph
1，Only by involving parents in the operation of their children’s schools can schools fulfill their social responsibilities.
第一个中心段落讨论对学校或政府的影响—中心句千万不要写太多的细节，只要笼统概括这段话的主要内容就可以了。
在这里，我们需要强调要求家长服务学校对学校是有好处的—可以帮助学校更好的承担起他们的社会责任。那他们的社会责任具体是什么呢，可以放到reasoning部分展开论述。
2， Parents will also benefit from spending sometime time participating in some volunteer activities held by their children’s schools.
中心句简明扼要提及我们的核心内容—家长会从中受益。但不需要具体写有什么好处，这部分内容放到后面去具体解释。
3，However, those volunteer activities should not be a heavy burden for parents who might be busy at work.
让步可以对题目中做事情的程度进行限定—时间不宜过长。家长们也有自己的工作和事情要做。
Conclusion
In sum, the above benefits brought by encouraging parents to spend some time on their children’s schools convince me that this is an insightful and reasonable advice for schools.
简单重申自己的整体逻辑
——————————
这样我们的三个核心段落就写完，下面来给大家看一下整篇文章的逻辑链条
大家会发现，在我们的核心段落，我们是按照总分这个逻辑来写的。
先给出结果—对学校好，对家长好；然后再展开细节论述，最后引出具有针对性的例子和分析。
通过对这道题目的分析，我想再次和大家强调，对于GRE写作想考4.0的同学来讲，在语言上我们能把话说清楚就够了，不用多么华丽。
而在逻辑结构上，我们一定要把保证从多个角度，精准地对题目展开全面的剖析。中心句可以在整体上概括那一段的核心内容。每一个中心段落都给人一种抽丝剥茧的感觉。
想要Issue拿高分，大家就需要展示出自己强大的推导能力，可以做到自圆其说。
为了保证大家对于每一道题目都可以展开类似这样总分的论述，我为大家总结出了五种逻辑公式。
只要大家可以熟悉掌握这5种公式的拆分思路，issue分分钟可以拿到4,0的分数，那大家写作总分上4就指日可待啦。
得逻辑者得4+，欢迎同学们跟我一起来理清GRE写作逻辑。
GRE作文万能例子总结
GRE 作文 万能例子 总结 !我们在备考GRE写作gre作文的时候，需要储备一些万能的例子，方便我们在写作的过程中使用。那么具体的备考过程中，大家应该储备哪些万能例子呢?下面我为大家做gre作文了整理，供大家参考。
GRE作文万能例子总结
1、 表象与本质、目的与 方法 、批评与赞扬、批判与继承
表象的对立往往意味着本质的相同。
Superficial confrontation indicates the similarity of essence.
2、 教育 类
1. For instance, applicants with Computer Science degrees would not only be qualified for jobs in high-tech companies, they would also be well prepared for any job with computer skills as a prerequisite.
2. A good education is supposed to include everything from languages to mathematics to science, etc.
3. A well-rounded education leads to well-balanced people, which in turn leads to a tolerant, knowledgeable society.
4. There are a great many children thinking the main purpose of education should be to afford them pleasure and enjoyment. (注意there be句型后的名词再加动词不能用原形!)
3、科技与人文;创新与传统
科技貌似推动人类向前，可前方是一片彷徨;人文让我们照见过往，给了我们存在希望。
Technology seemingly pushes humans forward, yet forward to the unknown; humanities mirror humans into the past, the past of existence and hope.
4、成功与事业
1. Jackie Chan once told that when he was still a teenager, he and his partners were required to practice more than 12 hours a day; and it was said Jet Li was sent to be an apprentice when he was hardly four years old.
2. Bill Gates, as we know, dropping out from university when he found the possibility of earning money in a new massive market - personal computer market. As a result, he succeeded
3. Steven Jobs found Apple company when he was young, and when his business reached the peak, he was fired by directors of board. However he never lost hope and didn't give up. Jobs set up a new company named Pixar and made several famous animation movies. Finally when Pixar was bought by Apple, Jobs returned to Apple.
5、时间性题目
传统与创新、历史是否可以被借鉴、科技与人文、进步
时间对于个体来说是线性而不可逆转的;而对于整个宇宙，无非是一个周而复始的圆圈。
Time for individuals is consecutive and irreversible, but for the universe, just a repetitive circle.
6、政府与人民
人民除了权利，什么都没有，甚至没有使用权利的基本能力。因而他们选举了一个叫做政府的机构。
Citizens, apart from claiming to have rights, in fact, have no capability to exercise their rights. Therefore, they select a government.
7、个体与集体、身份、领导者与大众
他人给了你身份，故而，他们就是你的地狱。
Others bestow you an identity, and thus, they are the hell.
8、政治与道德
政治是权力的斗争和利益的平衡。民主只是用制度制约人性的本恶。
Nothing is politics but the struggle of power and the balance of interests.
9、教育、传统与创新、批判思考
教育用束缚的方式，启迪了人们如何通过继承而达到颠覆的目的。
Education, by means of confinement, enlightens people to inherit and then to overthrow the past.
GRE作文提纲怎么写
1、gre写作什么时候开始练习在模考时加入提纲?
答：觉得比较适合的是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过时。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
2、gre写作用多长时间列提纲?
答：我的 经验 是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。ISSUE大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
3、gre作文提纲里都要包含些什么?
答：ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其 文章 结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
4、gre作文列提纲的一些技巧
答：需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。不要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟，建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。
GRE写作提纲的技巧：
一：明白什么时候开始练习在模考时加入新GRE作文提纲
对于考生来说比较适合的时间是在最后10天到一周的样子。因为这首先需要在一定高强度的写作练习之后，再者，需要对题目已经有了一定的把握。很多的提纲在之前都大体列过。然后在限时中加入提纲的写作。
二：了解需要多长时间才能列好GRE作文提纲推荐阅读：gre论坛 gmat论坛 托福写作机经 gre报名流程
我的经验是ISSUE总体比ARGU短。GRE ISSUE作文大体要2-3分钟，ARGU怎么都要3分钟。可能要5分钟。
三：弄清GRE作文提纲里都要包含些什么
对ISSUE来说，读第一遍题目时把关键词提出来，接着将核心话题列出来，根据这个话题开始一条一条列出你要写的东西;ARGU来说，因为题目比较长，所以读题的时间就要比前者长。
第一遍建议先把每一个意群讲的是什么简要提出来，排上序号;第二从这些小短句分析其文章结构和主要错误;第三把自己对错误的阐述顺序列出来。这样差不多是可以的了。
四：掌握一些制定GRE作文提纲的小技巧
需要在练习中找到自己的记录法，哪种缩写是自己看得明了的。要记出来的摘要最后自己还要辨析几分钟。建议在平时列提纲的时候就有意识的做一下限定时间练习，看2-3分钟能不能把大体的框架列出来。掌握了这些你就能轻轻松松拿到一个让你满意地GRE分数。
GRE作文 范文 ：过度专业化问题
GRE写作题目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”
近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以至于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否则他们的理念将几乎毫无用处。
GRE作文范文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a
new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!
From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
GRE写作满分范文
"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."
The quotation is certainly correct, insofar as it describes at least an element of wisdom. In other words, I do agree with the proposition, subject to the proviso that the achievement of wisdom may well also involve other traits or attributes.
Having qualified my answer somewhat, I must endorse the principles put forth in the quotation. Overlooking -- or, perhaps, forgetting -- is a crucial skill one needs to master in order to navigate the often-treacherous paths of life without undue torment. From my own experience, and from observations of friends, family members and business associates, I am well aware of the pitfalls which await those who fail to overlook the petty, the unnecessary and the irrelevant.
In modern America, as it happens, the importance of overlooking is probably greater than ever before. Even a person trying to lead a quiet, simple life encounters an endless stream of annoyances, errors and petty demands such as paperwork, filing numbers and taxes; long lines at the bank; exponentially aggravating traffic jams and sullen, uncooperative coworkers and neighbors. Those of us who cannot overlook such annoyances will invariably succumb to self-defeating dismay.
The ability to overlook also reflects a healthy sense of proportion and priorities. The wise "overlooker" will ignore his or her spouse's failings after making a considered judgment that these are outweighed, in the long run, by greater and more significant strengths. for example, what wise or reasonable person would destroy a marriage solely because an otherwise faithful, kind, generous, intelligent and prosperous partner occasionally tosses socks on the floor?
An elderly aunt of mine makes a striking example. Long widowed, she now spends her days sitting in her apartment, carping endlessly about the many relatives who have slighted her. Nobody calls enough. Nobody pays her any atention. Nobody cares, she says.
And, indeed, why should they? Who wants to visit with someone, elderly or otherwise, who does nothing but complain, find fault and scour for slights? Were she wiser, perhaps she would ignore or even suppress her interminable grievances and take more interest in the world at large, including the very individuals whose attention she purportedly craves.
The paradigm of overlooking applies with equal force in the worlds of business and politics. Look at Richard Nixon: a brilliant, often original thinker, he was nonetheless continually obsessed with minutiae and the unimportant. On some level, I'm sure, he himself realized the dramatic impact of such a glaring character flaw; when the situation was long past salvaging, he exhorted his staff and friends to "Never be petty," a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance.
More prosaically, in business and everyday life, it is indeed the wise person who overlooks or ignores a vast amount. Why come home every day nurturing a grudge? Why spend time grappling with activities, people or attitudes which bring nothing but pain and torment? Still, most of us do, at least somewhat, and find ourselves far diminished for it.
In sum, I think it's safe to say that much in this world merits not even a cursory examination, and those among us are wiser and happier who can successfully budget their time and energy in order to avoid negativity.
Comments:
This is a thoughtful, well-articulated analysis of the issue.
The response opens with a clear endorsement of the stated claim, along with an acknowledgement that wisdom involves additional traits. The writer then begins building an argument that modern life is so full of "petty annoyances" that it would be "self-defeating" to pay much attention to them. Using, first, examples that illustrate the trivial demands encountered everyday (e.g., paperwork, traffic jams), the analysis moves on to personal types of experiences (a partner annoying habits; an aunt self-pity) and then to politics, where, the writer implies, Nixon met his political demise at least partly because of his obsession with "minutiae and the unimportant." The examples clearly support the writer position and lead effectively to the concluding observation about learning to "budget" our time and energy to avoid the negative aspects of life.
In several places, the skillful use of questions helps move the analysis along. And throughout, the skillful use of sentence variety and precise vocabulary combine to convey meaning effectively, as in this excerpt: "when the situation was long past salvaging, he [Nixon] exhorted his staff and friends to a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance." This kind of insightful, articulate analysis merits a score of 6.
gre作文怎么考
GRE作文和阅读一起考。
GRE写作主要包括两部分gre作文：“AnalyzeanIssue”和“AnalyzeanArgument”。AnalyzeanIssue要求就一个一般性话题提出一个观点gre作文，题目中会就如何对该话题进行回应提出明确gre作文的写作要求。AnalyzeanArgument要求依据具体的题目对已有的论证进行评估。
GRE考试历来有考前看机经的做法gre作文，实际上对于写作也很有帮助，考生在提前gre作文了解题目的情况下，可以事先准备好模板和论述需要的论据素材，这样就能在考试中更加轻松省力地写好作文。
GRE写作分几个部分考什么要求
GRE写作共有两篇，包括一篇Issue和一篇Argument，均需要在30分钟内完成。
GRE写作题型要求
Issue：要求考生根据所给的题目，完成一篇表明自我立场的逻辑立论文。题库涉及社会、文化、科技、历史、政治、艺术等诸多方面，对于文章结构、论证逻辑、论证素材的要求都非常严格。
Argument：要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。
GRE作文的评分标准：
1、观点要有深度，论证要有说服力；
2、组织要有条理，表达清晰准确；
3、 语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富。
这三条分别说的是行文的“思想性”、“结构性”和“表达性”，众多高分作文的考生在这三方面都做得很好，因此，如果想在GRE写作部分拿高分，也可以从这里入手。
GRE写作的两篇作文总分均为6分，计算公式为：最终得分=（Issue的得分+Argument的得分）/2，最终的计分是以0.5分为一个格。
联系我们请扫一扫上面二维码